I had a weird (first time) Blogger experience.
I posted about this movie (see below) and I got a warning from Blogger that I had violated community guidelines. I posted on Facebook for people's opinions and it was really interesting.
I still don't really know which guideline I violated, but because I had grabbed an image from the internet (movie cover), I thought it might be copyright. As a librarian, I feel that I ought to have known better / done better, but I was at the lake and the book was at home.
So here's a picture of the book (forty-nine cents!)
And here's my post . . . I'm curious to see if Blogger will flag it again, or if this version is okay to post.
I watched this rather than read the print book that I had on my shelf. I'm glad I saw the movie and saved myself several hours of reading about Woodward and Bernstein and the Watergate break-in.
Knowing the basics of the story, it was interesting to see how far back some of the dirty dealings went. I wonder how different the 1972 election would have been if the Democrats hadn't been attacked by the federal government. McGovern would have made a better president, I believe. It's also sad to me that Trump's dealings make Nixon and Watergate seem like small potatoes. I'm getting cynical . . .
I liked seeing a young Robert Redford and a young Dustin Hoffman playing the two reporter roles. I liked seeing all the old technology! Rotary dial phones, print phonebooks, etc. I did check Wikipedia after watching the movie. Interesting stuff.
If you want to read more, the Wikipedia page is well-written.
(Initially, I had a hyperlink to the Wikipedia site, but I've removed that as well as the nickname of their secret informant.)
I hope this is allowed to stand! (As I told my FB friends, I thought this was an innocuous post . . . )



